A Primer on CSCOPE  
Open the Curtains

Our country is on the brink of losing it’s freedom and its constitutional rights due to the progressive /Marxist ideology of the Obama Administration and those that support his leftist (government knows best, collectivist) ideology. 

Unbeknownst to many who voted for Texas State Board of Education members Thomas Ratliff and Pat Hardy, who ran as republicans and stand by a Marxist Curriculum that is in a majority of Texas Schools. This so-called curriculum is called CSCOPE. If you have not heard about it before don’t be surprised a majority of the parents whose kids are being indoctrinated with it haven’t heard of it either. Why? 

Parents have not been allowed to view it. Teachers had to sign a non disclosure statement that they would not release the contents of it or say anything negative about it. Homework is discouraged and most schools who have purchased it have no text books for children to bring home. Surely this isn’t happening in Texas you may say. Sadly it is! Here is a list of Texas Schools that have purchased and implemented CSCOPE.

Texas has 20 Education Service Centers that were originally set up to help local schools. The directors of nineteen of the 20 (excluding 4) formed a non-profit called Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative , TESCCC which owns CSCOPE. ESC 4 is now a part of TESCCC. 

Follow me here for a minute, state employees, use tax money to form a non-profit which operates in state buildings and use state employees to sell their product. You can read more about the formation and lack of transparency in regard to TESCCC at the following links.

CSCOPE What is behind the curtain Part I

CSCOPE What is behind the Curtain Part II

Colleen Vera Trash Talk 

Date: August 14, 2013
Subject: VOLT PAC Opposes SHSU Threat to Seize Private Property

The Voters for Lower Taxes Political Action Committee (VOLT PAC), a recently formed General Purpose Political Action Committee to provide a voice for the voters and taxpayers of Huntsville and Walker County, strongly opposes the threat by Sam Houston State University to condemn and seize by power of Eminent Domain  any property surrounding or property located within Walker County.  

The City of Huntsville and Walker County should  sell property to the highest competitive bidder. By so doing the taxpayers of Huntsville will benefit from the sales proceeds and the taxpayers of Huntsville, Walker County, HISD and the Hospital District will benefit from future property and sales taxes generated by this prime commercial property.

We urge all citizens of Huntsville and Walker County to join with us and other citizen groups that are coming together to oppose any unjustified property grab by the University. If they succeed in this action, no private property, residential or commercial, in the City or County will be safe from future seizure. Sam Houston Tea Party agrees that if one property is taken by eminent domain, other homeowners or businesses will be in jeopardy. 

Donna Pinon   
Chairman, VOLT PAC                                               
Property Rights Organization
Training, Educating, Advocating, Mobilizing
Your VOICE NOW will be the future of Texas Education.   Contact Dan Patrick and tell him "NO" to Common Core and National Based Curriculums.  

Growing Rejection of Common Core

by Phyllis Schlafly
President & Founder of Eagle Forum

The most controversial issue in education today is clearly Common Core. It's being more hotly debated than bullying, zero tolerance, sex ed, abortion or even school lunches.

Common Core is the title of a new set of standards the Obama administration has been trying to force the states to use. Even before the standards were written, 45 states and the District of Columbia signed on, encouraged by inducements of federal funds. The principal outliers are Texas, Alaska, Nebraska and Virginia.

Now that parents and teachers are finding out what is commanded by Common Core State Standards and what is being taught by "Common Core-aligned" materials, moms and teachers are raising a ruckus, trying to get their respective states to repeal their involvement. Many are demanding that their state withdraw altogether from Common Core, principally because they believe it is a takeover by the Obama administration of all that kids are taught and not taught.

The backlash against Common Core has developed into a potent political force. About 100 bills have been introduced into various state legislatures to cancel, stop or slow down Common Core requirements.

Indiana broke the ice on March 23, becoming the first state to pass an anti-Common Core bill. It strikes out references to Common Core in the law and requires the state board of education to maintain Indiana's sovereignty while complying with federal standards.

When Indiana Gov. Mike Pence signed this legislation that opted his state out of Common Core, he said, "I believe our students are best served when decisions about education are made at the state and local level."

The Indiana bill was introduced as a straight repeal of Common Core, but it ended up keeping so many Common Core requirements that its original sponsor, Sen. Scott Schneider, pulled his name off of it.

The game of some people, obviously, is to pass standards that are nearly identical to Common Core but under a different name, because the name itself has become toxic. And states are always solicitous to maintain their flow of federal funds, which the Obama administration uses as bribes or threats.

The second state that went public against Common Core was South Carolina. On May 30, Gov. Nikki Haley signed a bill abolishing Common Core standards in her state beginning in 2015.

Legislators were responding to constituent complaints that Common Core introduces frivolous and illogical teaching techniques to no apparent purpose while imposing new standards that are not meaningful improvements.
Common Core ends up being a top-down, one-size-fits-all approach.

Parents won a remarkable victory when the Oklahoma legislature repealed use of Common Core by the overwhelming bipartisan vote of 71-18 in the House and 31-10 in the Senate, and replaced it with academic standards written by state government officials. After receiving an estimated 20,000 phone calls in support of the repeal, Gov. Mary Fallin signed the repeal into law on June 5.

This law directs the Oklahoma State Board of Education to create new and more rigorous standards by August of 2015. The State Regents for Higher Education, the State Board of Career and Technology Education and the Oklahoma Department of Commerce will evaluate the newly written standards to make sure they truly make students "college- and career-ready."

Fallin's message in signing the repeal of Common Core was blunt in explaining what is wrong with the standards. She wrote: "President Obama and Washington bureaucrats have usurped Common Core in an attempt to influence state education standards. 

Common Core is now widely regarded as the President's plan to establish federal control of curricula, testing and teaching strategies."

Fallin's message reminded us, "Citizens, parents, educators and legislators ... have expressed fear that adopting Common Core gives up local control of Oklahoma's public schools." We congratulate Oklahoma's governor for having the courage to stop the well-financed plan to railroad Oklahoma's public schools into kowtowing to federal control.

From the start, Common Core has been ballyhooed as a state-led (not federal) initiative each state could voluntarily choose to adopt. But, as the governor wrote, "The words 'Common Core' in Oklahoma are now so divisive that they have become a distraction that interferes with our mission of providing the best education possible for our children."

Like most left-wingers, Education Secretary Arne Duncan played the race card (for which he later had to apologize) when was besieged on all sides by Common Core critics. He accused opponents of the program of just being "white suburban moms."

Duncan should have read The New York Times, which published a picture of both white and African-American moms protesting Common Core wearing signs that read, "My child is not common." Parents nationwide are saying no to Common Core.

The Remembrance Project

The Remembrance Project, a 501(c)3 non-profit, was created in 2009 to honor and remember Americans who have been killed by illegal aliens.                       

KrisAnne Hall
We encourage you to sign up for KrisAnne's weekly emails to Join Liberty's First Brigade.    Click below or copy/paste:

You will receive a confirmation email.  You have joined the Liberty First Brigade and, by email, will begin your journey with a 1st Amendment video and fact sheet. 
Click Here  Your First Amendment Rights      
KrisAnne Hall (7:49) 

Click Here  Your Second Amendment Rights 
 Kris Anne Hall  (7:23)

Your Fourth Amendment RightsClick Here  
  KrisAnne Hall  (9:19)

Related Article
 E.O. 12333 End-Running the Fourth Amendment

Click Here  Separation of Church and State   
  KrisAnne Hall  (1:15:00)

Executive Order 13618 - Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions   (July 6, 2012)

Section 1. Policy. The Federal Government must have the ability to communicate at all times and under all circumstances to carry out its most critical and time sensitive missions. Survivable, resilient, enduring, and effective communications, both domestic and international, are essential to enable the executive branch to communicate within itself and with: the legislative and judicial branches; State, local, territorial, and tribal governments; private sector entities; and the public, allies, and other nations. Such communications must be possible under all circumstances to ensure national security, effectively manage emergencies, and improve national resilience. The views of all levels of government, the private and nonprofit sectors, and the public must inform the development of national security and emergency preparedness (NS/EP) communications policies, programs, and capabilities. 
           Read the complete Executive Order 13618 here....
Three Sources for Education Issues: 

 Red Hot Conservative 
 This site covers Texas schools and National  educational initiatives that are progressive and a threat to our children and country.

Women On the Wall
Sign up for notices of the weekly teleconferences on Wednesdays at 8:30 pm
Hear speakers and  the latest on educational issues. 
Wednesday at 8:30 pm         call 1-267-507-0240          Access code 702165

WomenOnTheWall™ (WOW) believes that the women of America play a central role in the protection and security of our sovereign nation. The grandmothers, mothers, daughters, sisters of American women of all political persuasions, age and race are the stewards of the home and hearth and will stop at nothing to defend and protect their families and their country. 
This site reports on the National impact of the  Common Core curriculum and focus on changing the heritage and history of our country.
Smart Meters

Information in this section has been taken from newsletters from the We the People Are the 9-12 Association in Houston. This group was founded by Thelma Taormina and she and her husband Nick have been fighting the installation of  Smart Meters on Texas homes for years.  

"Opting out does not require a meter reader, and need not be a financial burden. As has been done in many other cases, the TDUs could transmit electric consumption over existing phone lines or power lines, which would also be much more secure than wireless transmissions and much safer by eliminating RF exposure. In fact, in many cases this landline technology is what was removed from a house when the Smart Meter was installed. Additionally, many remote or rural customers are self reporting. This method could be offered to those who choose to opt out, as well as potentially an option to go online and input one’s meter readings onto a webpage would be easy to set up and run. "

As you know, Nick and I were in Austin Monday, February 10, 2014. I sadly report that Nick and I were the only ones to speak at the public hearing for project number 42029, which relates directly to the rule they will write relating to who the Transmission and Distribution Companies, not to mention the Retail Electric Provider (your billing company) can share your personal information with.

If we cannot find a way to get more people to attend these public hearings and actually speak up to stop the theft of our freedom by these bureaucrats, then we only have ourselves to blame when we no longer have access to the electricity produced by our own state and country. They have finally figured out how they can reduce your energy use without them even having to contact you or let you know they are reducing it. They will have their CONTROL whether you like it or not!


I know there was an article on Breitbart this week about the meeting with Lt. Governor Dewhurst, the PUCT and Texans Against Smart Meters. From that meeting, the Lt. Governor has called for interim charges and a health study on the meters. This is great news, but studies are simply opinions of whoever is doing the study and we will have no control over who is picked for the study. I will leave it at that.

What I do know is that David Dewhurst is actually on OUR SIDE. I personally spoke with him last year at a meeting with other grassroots leaders and in front of all of them I outright asked him about us being charged to opt-out, and at that time he said that as far as he was concerned we would not be charged. But the truth is, he is only one man in Austin. You can and should send thanks to several Democrat AND Republican State Senators for NOT getting a bill passed this last session (yes, a bit of sarcasm)! A bill was written and passed out of committee that would prevent the power companies for charging the fees, BUT the Senators would not bring it to the floor for a vote. The House Reps did NOTHING.

In The News (you might have missed)!

San Antonio, TX - Jan. 25-30, 2014  there was a convention held called "DistribuTECH" and it all revolved around the Energy Sector, specifically focusing on the smart grid, meters and of course "Climate Change". All the major players were there! One specific article really concerns me about a report that just came out.

The report was put out by an organization called "The Smart Grid Consumer Collaborative (SGCC)". The name of this organization is deceptive because it is made up of industry personnel. What is even worse is, Christine Wright (a lead staffer at the Texas Public Utility Commission) sits on the Board of Directors for this organization. Here is the main staff person who is drafting all of the rules surrounding the Smart Grid and Smart Meters sitting on a Board with industry personnel and creating reports skewed to make it seem as if consumers are totally on board with what is happening within the electric industry 

UPDATE    Read the History of the Fight Against Smart Meters

Read more here: Austin Smart Meters 
    Austin Energy is the first electric utility company in Texas to offer an Opt Out Program
          See links for Opt Out letters for Electric and Gas Smart Meters
          Read key issues: 
                    Health, Privacy, Electrical Safety Problems, Electric Grid Security


There is always someone or something that manages to throw roadblocks to the rights we have to challenge Unconstitutional, and Illegal Infringements upon the average citizen.

As many already know, our appeal was filed with the court, our brief has been submitted to the court, and the court date had been set. What has happened now is the Attorney General's Office has filed a challenge to our appeal. They are trying to use a court decision that was made regarding a case involving the Public Utility Commission of Texas about an appeal about an actual rule submitted but not adopted by the PUCT. Now our attorney, Roger Borgelt, is working on the reply to this challenge. Due to the timing process, this challenge now will interfere with the schedule set for the court date of Dec. 2, 2014.

Something you all can and should do if you are so inclined, is to write to the Attorney General's Office expressing your dismay that they would try to block our right to appeal to the courts. Remember, your Attorney General is running for Governor...while Gregg Abbott is not actually handling this case himself, he is the "boss" in that office. Many of you have been attending speaking engagements by Gregg Abbott. Many of you are donating to his campaign. You might consider writing his campaign with your concerns, and you might want to ask Mr Abbott about the challenge being made against our day in court.

Click here for Letters to Greg Abbott and the Greg Abbott Campaign
Pipeline Resources:

For more information on the concerns related to the three pipelines see the following resources: rights 

 For information call: 936-395-0728 
 For Reading Research go to:

Click here:
   Texas Landowner's Bill of Rights -TLBOR

"Furthermore, pipeline companies are under no obligation to tell landowners what is being transported, much less to disclose the risks of these substances to their land, their homes and their water.

We believe that holding public hearings would underscore the importance of amending the TLBOR – which not only demands legislative leadership but citizen action
THE EPA AND WATER ISSUES       Maps were kept hidden......
Texas Water Fights by Individuals and Groups
(see articles below)

09/25/14             San Antonio Water System & Simboro - 142 mile pipeline         
                                  A Call For Help From Central Texas Water Friends Just To the West of Walker County

08/28/14           Is The EPA Preparing For A Massive Private Land Grab?             

Water and the EPA March 26, 2014  Proposal required 
90 comment period until June 2014

          01/23/14       Water Fight Ends In Ranchers' Favor Property owners allowed to pump out as much as they want      

An acre-foot (AFY) is roughly equal to the amount of water three typical Texas households use in a year.
KrisAnne Was Back
Feb. 16th

​State Sovernity
Huntsville, Texas 

Texas Senate Bill 1406

A Bill to be Entitled An Act related to the State Board of Education oversite of regional education service center services and products concerning student curriculum.  

 Signed by Gov. Perry June 14, 2013 Read the complete bill HERE

Some School Districts were encouraged to download the CSCOPE LESSON before they were pulled off line.  

 What did Huntsville ISD do ?
Huntsville Schools, We Still Have a Problem
Parent and community input is needed in Huntsville schools to assure Quality Instructional Programs,Successful
Teachers and Students
Third Session - State Sen. Dan Patrick files bill to end CSCOPE lesson plans July 24, 2013

Austin - On Wednesday, State Sen. Dan Patrick filed Senate Bill 41 that prohits the use of CSCOPE lesson plans. Senator Patrick has asked Governor Perry to add this important issue to the call of the special session. 

During the 2013 legislative session, Senator Patrick led the charge to put an end to CSCOPE lesson plans. He passed legislation (SB1406) that gave the State Board of Education the authority to review the CSCOPE lesson plans. Before the bill passed, the Texas Education Service Centers Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC) decided to stop producing CSCOPE lesson plans. With this agreement and bill enacted into law, he believed the issue was settled.  

Recently, Texas Education Agency attorneys have stated that the CSCOPE lesson plans are public domain and potentiallly available to anyone despite the fact that they are a licensed product. Senator Patrick disagrees with that analysis and is pursuing that legal argument.  

Another concern of Senator Patrick related to the operation of TESCCC. As a result, Senator Patrick has asked the State Auditor to perform an audit of the contracting practices of the governing board.  

Among the concerns outlined in his letter to State Auditor John Kell are the facts that the Education Service Centers failed to comply with state law requiring a bidding process and the adoption of formal contracts with state government vendors.

"Texans deserve an open and transparent state government and that is particularly true of our public education system," said Patrick. "The curriculum in our classrooms must be open to public scrutiny as well as the contracts to publish them." 

"The vast majority of parents, teachers, and legislators have mde it clear they want CSCOPE out of their schools. I stand with them and intend to make sure no one tries to slide CSCOPE lesson plans under the classroom door." said Patrick.
July 22, 2013
Lt. Governor David Dewhurst's 
letter to Barbara Cargill, 
Chair of the State Board of Education

Dear Chair Cargill, 

  I am deeply troubled by recent reports of public school districts planning to use CSCOPE lesson plans in the coming school year. As you know, I have serious issues with reported factual error and bias in CSCOPE's lesson plans, and my intent, and that of the Legislature in passing SB 1406, was to end this controvery once and for all. We were told our CSCOPE problems were behind us. Over the past few weeks, I have learned that this could not be further from the truth. 
  It is my understanding the State Board of Education (SBOE) will have an agenda item at the September Board meeting to discuss the review and adoption of CSCOPE lesson plans, which is the subject of Senate Bill 1406. In addition, with the school year rapidly approaching, am requesting the SBOE to convene a panel to hear questions, comments and concerns from school districts, parents and citizens on not only the CSCOPE lesson plans but also the SCOPE, Sequence and Assessment components. By providing this forum, I believe the SBOE can help districts find other lesson plan options, or at least provide transparency for parents and local voters to know what their local districts are using to educate their children. 
  It is my intent to pass legislation as soon as possible to prevent districts from using CSCOPE lesson plans, as well as possibly the Scope, Sequence and Assessment components and to move the Sunset date for the Regional Education Service Centers (ESCs) from 2019 to 2017. Additionally, I have requested the State Auditor perform an audit on the ESCs money flow related to the financial and contractual matters involving CSCOPE.

  David Dewhurst, Texas Lieutenant Governor
Sam Houston Tea Party has many opportunities for you to be active from sharing your ideas for activities and speakers; working at community events such as GET OUT THE VOTE and registering voters at Fair on the Square; attending meetings with guest speakers; joining others in studying the Constitution or woking on a "watch dog "committee by attending County and City meetings.  

Contact Us
Update from Ginger Russell

For the complete article Click Here

Texas Education Service Centers ... Milking Texas Taxpayers

Texas has 20 Education Service Centers located throughout the state. Texas education service centers were initially set up to assist rural district with services. The ESC’s are funded with some state money as well as your local school district through service contracts and professional development and conferences. The ESC’s have become retirement homes for superintendents who have funded them through ISD’s with your tax money.

On TEA’s website states that the guiding principles for the ESC’s are…..

Accountable - ESCs are responsible and answerable to TEA and the commissioner, the Texas Legislature, the ESC Board of Directors, stakeholders, customers, and the general public. Accountability comes in many forms and is used in all aspects of ESCs’ daily business.  I am laughing in my seat at this statement. The ESC’s are the ones who started their own non-profit company, Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC) and leased a secretive online curriculum management company to 900+ school districts called Cscope. They requested teachers to sign a non-disclosure statement that saying the contents of the curriculum would not be released or they would not say anything negative about it the product.

For the complete article CLICK HERE
Texas Counties under the rails:  Dallas, Ellis, Freestone, Grimes, Harris, Leon, Limestone, Madison, Montgomery, Navarro and Waller Counties. These Texans will not allow a private company using governmental authority of eminent domain to take land for their profit. 
Click here for 

Click X to close
These files are moving to  the Focus Issues Page via links       ARCHIVES            ARTICLES        LINKS    GRAPHICS
                                Incumbents  Unopposed   
Walker County Judge:                 Danny Pierce
County Court and Clerk 
    County Judge:                      Tracy Sorenson 
District Court and Clerk 
    12th District Court                   Don Kraemer
     278th District Court                Hal Ridley
District Clerk                                Robyn Flowers
County Tax Assessor/Collector:  Diana McRae
and Elections
County Clerk                                 Kari French 
County Treasurer                        Amy Klawinsky
​County Auditor
Criminal District Attorney:             David Weeks
Sheriff                                          Clint McRae
Election for Huntsville City Mayor 
The mayor is an at-large position that may be voted on by any qualified voter of the city of Huntsville.

In the City of Huntsville,  there are about 14,000 registered voters.  For the Run-Off Election only 1780 citizens voted.   Andy Brauninger was elected with 55% of the vote total - 992 votes.  
Andy Brauninger Wins the Huntsville Mayoral  Run-Off 
Click here to read Mr. Brauninger's written response re: Proposition B.

On Oct. 8th Mr. Brauninger spoke at a SHTP event and spoke to the positive about economic development  for Huntsville.  
Step Up Texans 2016
The upcoming year will  be a challenge for all Texans to work together to elect conservative, fiscally responsible, knowledgeable and courageous leaders to govern at the local, state and national levels.  

On this page, scroll down for election results:
Huntsville City Mayor 
Walker County Elections 
Texas House of Representatives, Dist. 18
Texas Statewide Offices
  Railroad Commissioners, Supreme Court
 and Courts of riminal Appeals
US Congress, District 8
US President 

To receive the SHTP Newsletters, 
 Notices of Events and Meetings
​or to ask questions about issues

The Pulse 2016     The following is a summary of a 60 page document.  It is easy to read and follow the history of Common Core and where the Presidential Candidate's stand.

Four years ago, Common Core was considered a "done deal",
uncontroversial and approved by Democrats and Republican leaders alike.  It had been pushed into 45 states without notice to legislators and parents alike.  Today, Common Core and related educational issues of local control of schools and family privacy have emerged as significant campaign issues for candidates and for a motivated network of grassroots citizens turned activists. The Pulse (a project of American Principles in Action and the New Hampshire's Cornerstone Action are releasing our first formal report card to voters
on how GOP candidates are doing in responding to the concerns of Common Core parents and the experts who have validated their concerns.  

1.  The Pulse 2016 Report Card
Go to the link below for a 60 page report on where Presidential Candidates stand on the issue of Education.  See a Report Card, a chart with issues and candidate scores, read candidates statements on Education.

2. The Public-Private Partnership: How Private Entities Developed the Common Core  and Enlisted the Federal Government to Drive it into the States.
 $150 Million to write the standards (Gates Foundation dollars)
 $363 Million Stimulus Bill authorization in funding  "to a consortia of states to 
 develop assessments and measure student achievement against standards
 $4.35 Billion Race to the Top Funds - to be competitive for a share of the funds, 
 applicant states had to adopt  the Common Core with, at two summer months to evaluate the final commitment to the product, compare it to their current standards, discuss the matter with their citizens and commit to replace their standards with the Common Core.

3. The Common Core System/Standards do not exist in isolation
Assessments required by No Child Left Behind would align with the Common Core and that teachers and school districts would be evaluated.  The data from the assessments (and from other sources) would be and is fed into these databases.  The goal is to track teacher-student connections  for  purposes of performance evaluation and to track all students from  early education into the workforce.

4. The Common  Core Standards Lock Children Into an Inferior Education
 In fact, the Common Core developers have admitted that Common Core will not     produce students who are ready for STEM studies ( science, technology, engineering and math).

5. The Common Core Pushback
Participants in the pushback movement initially became engaged for multiple reasons: the qualitative defects of the Standards themselves and the aligned curricula, concerns with the assessments aligned with the Common Core  or concerns with the connected intrusion into student and family privacy.  But many quickly became alarmed by the broader picture:  The Comnon Core scheme is designed to influence other subjects in K-12, to transform education in America "out-based" training (not education, to feed into elitist economic policy whereby children are reduced to  "human capital" and establish a sweeping and intrusive system of data collection and student -tracking. 

6. Making Big Ideas  Into Small Ideas:  The GOP tendency
   At the heart of the report card is a parent and citizen movement to take control over education decisions - making versus the GOP tendency to make big issues into small issues.  Activists recognize a strong connection between on one hand, the poor qualify of the Common Core and the intrusive data collection and, on the other hand, the federal government's dominant role in these policies.  They understand that the failure to address the big idea, restoring federalism (returning  power to the states), will negate the success of any small ideas suggested to weak failed policies.

1.) Have they spoken out and acted against Common Core?

2.) Do they understand and have they made a specific commitment to protect state and local control of education from further federal intrusion?

3.) What efforts has the candidate made to protect student and family privacy interests against the rising demands of industry and central planners for more personal student data?

Explanation of Grading:
For an A
Fighting Common Core, Protecting state/local decision making, Protecting child/family privacy making, Champions the issue e.g.,offers legislation, makes it a centerpiece issue

For a B
Professes support, but has not provided leadership or otherwise championed 

For a C
Has neither helped nor hurt the cause

For a D
Has an overall negative record on the issue

For a F
Has an overall negative record on the issue, obtustly and consistently work against the issue
In 2010, What Was Texas Doing about Common Core ?
​In 2010, the Texas Commissioner of Education, Robert 
Scott and the governor, Rick Perry, were particularly attunded to the federal influence on education policy.   In rejecting Race to the Top application Gov. Perry stated "We would be foolish and irresponsible to place our children's future in the hands of unelected  bueacrats and special interest groups thousands of miles away in Washington, virtually eliminating parent's participation in their children's education.  If Washington were truly concerned about funding education with solutions that match local challenges they would make the money available to state with no strings attached.

Through Race to the Top funding, the U S Department of Education seems to be coercing states like Texas to suddenly abandon their own locally established curriculum standards in favor or adopting national standards spearheaded by organizations in Washington,D.C.

Top Reasons to Close the Border    Brietbart 

With thousands of illegal immigrant minors continuing to pour over America’s southern border, the same politicians are singing the same songs: we can’t close the border, we must pursue comprehensive immigration reform, we can only reach political consensus if we compromise on border enforcement.             

 It's all nonsense.  

Disease, Safety of U.S. Citizens, Safety of Illegal Immigrant  children, Threat of Terrorism, Low-Wage US Workers Will Pay, The Taxpayers Will Pay, Voter Fraud, American Culture Is Under Attack. 

Click here for more detail discussion of top reasons......

​Despite these grave threats to America, members of both parties continue to pretend that leaving the border open is a viable option – Republicans, because they are beholden to big businesses seeking cheap labor, and Democrats, because they wish to confiscate the wealth of citizens. But at this point, there is simply no excuse for not closing the border.
Crisis on the Border - What Can We Do?

The answer is where it has always been…with the people!

Grassroots activists of all stripes SHOULD be attending every school board and PTA meeting, every city council and county commission meeting, and every State and Congressional town hall meeting to simply ask relevant questions and demand answers.  They they should take a minute before they begin asking questions to set a brief narrative that supports compassion yet frames the discussion in broader terms.  

It is recommended that the following points be incorporated into a beginning narrative. This document will provide a series of template questions that are loosely–based on the government entity for which they are expected to be asked. For government meetings, the grassroots activists are encouraged to engage and ask questions related to the fallout resulting from the
 Texas border crisis are listed as follows:  

  1. City Councils and County Commissions
  2. ISD School Boards
  3. Congressional Town Halls 



This website is not associated with any election authority. It is hosted and maintained by Vote-USA. All information on this site was obtained from various state election authorities, the candidates themselves or from their staff or websites. Vote-USA is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization funded by contributions from private citizens.
Double click on the link below or
Copy and Paste the following link into your browser

Following is an EXAMPLE of what you will see that each candidate said abou
" National Security and Terrorism - USA Patriot Act" 
                 Compare Republican Candidates
Donald Trump  

With an eye for “proper oversight,” Trump said, Obama and top congressional Republicans “should work together to make a program which the public can support.” Trump added:

"I support legislation which allows the NSA to hold the bulk metadata. For oversight, I propose that a court, which is available any time on any day, is created to issue individual rulings on when this metadata can be accessed." (09/11/2015)

Ted Cruz        

The controversy surrounding domestic surveillance by the National Security Agency (NSA) is expected to divide hawks from libertarians in the 2016 race for the Republican presidential nomination, according to the National Journal.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, both staking out a libertarian/tea party position, are strong opponents of the NSA vacuuming up phone records of Americans in search of terrorist or espionage threats.

Paul would dismantle the NSA; Cruz would reform the agency.

Cruz backed the USA Freedom Act sponsored by Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont which — had it passed — would have reformed but not gutted the Patriot Act.

Cruz (09/20/2015)

​Marco Rubio    

Rubio, invoking 9/11 and recent activities of the Islamic State, called on his colleagues on Capitol Hill to permanently extend Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act, one of the law’s most controversial provisions. (07/02/2015)
Ben Carson     

"I think some aspects of the Patriot Act are wise, so you don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater, but certainly in terms of the Fourth Amendment, the unwarranted mining of data from citizens is a violation," Carson told The Hill. (07/03/2015)

​                   Compare Democratic Candidates
Hillary Clinton   

Hillary Clinton voted for the original USA PATRIOT Act in 2001, as well as the revised version in 2006. While she has criticized the Bush administration for violations of civil liberties, she has not stood out as a civil liberties candidate in this regard. (08/27/2015)
Bernard "Bernie" Sanders                   

I voted against the Patriot Act every time, and it still needs major reform.

I welcome a federal appeals court ruling that the National Security Agency does not have the legal authority to collect and store data on all U.S. telephone calls. Now Congress should rewrite the expiring eavesdropping provision in the so-called USA Patriot Act and include strong new limits to protect the privacy and civil liberties of the American people.

Let me be clear: We must do everything we can to protect our country from the serious potential of another terrorist attack. We can and must do so, however, in a way that also protects the constitutional rights of the American people and maintains our free society.

Do we really want to live in a country where the NSA gathers data on virtually every single phone call in the United States—including as many as 5 billion cellphone records per day? I don’t. Do we really want our government to collect our emails, see our text messages, know everyone’s Internet browsing history, monitor bank and credit card transactions, keep tabs on people’s social networks? I don’t.

Unfortunately, this sort of Orwellian surveillance, conducted under provisions of the Patriot Act, invades the privacy of millions of law-abiding Americans. (06/14/2015)

​This site gives candidate answers for the following Main Categories  and Many, Many sub- issues:

Reasons & Objectives
National Security & Terrorism
American Minorities
Gay, Lesbian & LGBT
Foreign Policy
Middle East
Afghanistan, Pakistan & Iraq
Military & Defense
Labor Wages & Unions
Elections & Politics

​Abortion, Pro-Life, Stem Cell & Cloning

Internet, Media & Communications
Federal Budget & Fiscal Policy
Medical Insurance
Courts, Laws & Justice
Health & Medical
Energy, Gas, Oil & Autos
Values, Religion & Family
Civil Rights
Prescription Drugs
Social Security & Pensions
Illegal Drugs & Marijuana
Poverty & Welfare
Public Service
Science, Technology & Space
Food & Agriculture
Alcohol, Cigarettes & Gambling
Financial Crisis

Use this site to see where they stand on the issues

Education  The Pulse 2016 is a summary of a 60 page document. It is easy to read and follow the history of Common Core and where the Presidential Candidate's stand.

In this section, find resources to see where candidates stand on issues

Border Security Top Reasons to Close the Border

Immigration Crisis on the Border- What Can We Do?
Use Vote USA to see where the candidates stand on the issues - see an example at this bottom of the page.

Precinct 1
Justice of the Peace:  Janie Farris
Constable:  John Hooks

Precinct 2
Commissioner:  Ronnie White 
Justice of Peace: Mike Countz

Precinct 3
Justice of the Peace: Mark Holt
Constable: Steve Hill

Precinct 4
Commissioner: Jimmy Henry 
Justice of the Peace: Stephen Cole
Constable: Gene Bartee

Click on the link below to explore the Categories and Sub Categories



​                                     Trump          Cruz        Kasich                  
Mar. 1 Walker Co. Tx       28.8%        45.3%       3.04%  

​Education Common Core  

Subscribe at
  Receive emails from the educational experts: 
(APUSH) A critique of the new College Board's Advance U.S. History framework

Resources Fighting Common Core below: 
Freedom works

We Will Not Conform Action Plan

This plan is everything you want to know about Common Core.   Read the 39 page Action Plan   (PDF)
For the Links in the PDF document - copy them to your browser

By State/Candidate Voting Percentages
Calendar Election Dates (Primary, Caucus)

​District 8 Results   Col. Andre Dean    Steve Toth 40%             Kevin Brady 53%           Craig McMichael

 Sam Houston Tea Party will provide opportunities for candidates, at all levels, to come before Walker County residents.  We will continue to share information and resources for high priority issues.  Citizens are encouraged to submit subjects for discussion.

 Please  use the CONTACT US button to submit requests for information or issues.
Walker Co               6.86%                         31.97%                       54.83%                     6.34%
District-wide            4.29%                         37.32%                       53.41%                     4.96%

Click here for Click here for Click here for District 8  March 1, 2016 Vote by County 
Counties in District 8 : Grimes, Harris,  Houston,  Leon, Madison, Montgomery, San Jacinto, Trinity and Walker
No Run-Off Election:     Winner Brady with 53%
Texas Primary Election  March 1, 2016 
Texas House of Representatives, District 18
Texas  Primary Election  March 1, 2016
U.S. Representative, District 8

Three county vote totals for Liberty, San Jacinto and Walker Counties:

      Bailes 8651                    K. Strahan 9548         


Click here for  Texas House District 18 March 1, 2016 Vote Results by County 

Candidate(s) Advancing to the May 24th  2016 Run-Off Election  Texas House, District 18
           Earnest Bailes and  Keith Strahan
Click name to read biography

Election Results     March 1, 2016
                                        Run Off Election May 24, 2016

County Commissioner, Precinct 1  

                               Tom DeYoung                26.46%

                               Danny Kuykendall         42.98%   

Not in Run- Off:  
George Williamson  8.32%  and Jim Willett 22.25%) 

County Commissioner, Precinct 3

                      Glen R. Reader  27.75%                  


Not in Run-Off                   
 Bill Tutor 23.25%,  
Paul Webb 20.76%,G.A. Creagor 

Constable Precinct 2

                                   Reed Prehoda        40.60%  

                                    Shane Loosier       31.99%

Not in Run-Off:  John French  27.41%
Republican Party Chairperson                  

                        Linda G. McKenzie  63.16%           
President of the United States

Local cities want to turn U.S. Highway 190 into an interstate
The designated Central Texas Corridor begins in West Texas and generally follows US Highway 190 through Killeen, Belton, Bryan-College Station, Huntsville, Livingston, Woodville and Jasper before terminating on State Highway 63 at the Sabine River.   

Federal Highway Administration 
The Central Texas Corridor commencing at the logical terminus of Interstate Route 10, generally following portions of United States Route 190 eastward, passing in the vicinity Fort Hood, Killeen, Belton, Temple, Bryan, College Station, Huntsville, Livingston, and Woodville, to the logical terminus of Texas Highway 63 at the Sabine River Bridge at Burrs Crossing. [I-14]

U.S. Highway to be renamed, designated as Interstate 14
Click here for the news

Clinton         Sanders
61.34%           37.38%
       E. Bailes             K. Strahan       
The following is a Jan. 29, 2016 news release from the Gulf Coast Strategic Highway Coalition:
BRYAN, TEXAS -- The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) will continue to initiate planning efforts that will lead to future development of the various components of the Gulf Coast Strategic Highway System which connects U.S. Army facilities to strategic military ports at Corpus Christi and Beaumont.

That system includes the Central Texas Corridor, a federal high priority highway corridor recently designated by Congress and identified as future Interstate 14. That corridor generally follows the route of US 190 across the state running from I-10 in West Texas to Fort Hood at Killeen and east through Belton, Bryan/College Station, Huntsville, Livingston, Woodville and Jasper before terminating at the Sabine River near Fort Polk.        Read more here
Who Has Been Representing Walker County and the 
City of Huntsville During This Planning Process?
Ballot Count



If you don’t want this on your property, your neighbor’s property or in your community for the next six years (which is how long construction will take), here’s what you can do;

 1. Contact Texas Farm Bureau and insist that TFB support their current eminent domain policy, their members and rural families by opposing high speed rail. Be persistent. Don’t let them off the hook with vague assurances. Don’t relent until they have publicly opposed the high speed rail project.

 2. Tell Texas Farm Bureau you will consider cancelling your membership if they don’t support farmers, ranchers and rural families in opposition to the proposed high speed rail. 

3. Contact your local, state and national elected
 officials and tell them “no eminent domain for private gain”.

 4. Support groups like “

 Dan Agan, Landowner in Grimes County
Bill Daugette     23.49%

28 delegates
44 delegates 
GOP Winner takes most 172
GOP Winner takes all delegates 27
GOP Winner takes all delegates 51
24 delegates 
GOP Winner takes all delegates 

Lord, keep our servicemen and women safe, whether they serve at home or overseas. Hold them in your loving hands and protect them as they protect us. 
Where is Texas Farm Bureau?
 A private company, Texas Central Partners, (along with their Japanese corporate partners) is proposing to build a high speed rail line between Houston and Dallas. Texas Farm Bureau opposed the Trans Texas Corridor in 2008 and opposed a high speed rail line in 2009.

Today Texas Farm Bureau is silent. 
These four organizations have publically voiced their opposition to the proposed high speed rail; 
1. Texas Forestry Association
2. Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association
3. Texas Soil and Water Conservation Districts 
4. Texas A&M University Student Senate 

The California Farm Bureau joined California residents in filing a lawsuit to stop the high speed rail in California. 

Where is Texas Farm Bureau?
 The 2015 State Policies of the Texas Farm Bureau include the following; “We oppose using the power of eminent domain for recreational, environmental or private business purposes.”

Texas Farm Bureau claims to be 
“The Voice of Texas Agriculture”

 TFB has abandoned their members and their mission statement in regards to the proposed high speed rail.  With TFB’s silence they have in effect become “The Voice of Japan Corporations”.

Walker County Candidates For May 24, 2016

Precinct 1 Commissoner 
Danny Kuykendall   59.16%
 Tom DeYoung   40.84 %

Precinct 3 Commissioner  
Bill Daugette   55.76%
 Glen Reader   44.24 %

Precinct 2 Constable  
Shane Loosier  54.44%
 Reed Prehoda  45.56 %

 Texas House of Representatives, District 18
Run Off Election Winner:  

Ernest Bailes   ​

  Ernest Bailes   Keith Strahan

Candidates for State Wide Election

Texas Railroad Commissioner

Republican Candidates 
 Gary Gates            Wayne Christian 

Democratic Candidates  
 C. Garrett and G. Yarborough 
Winners: Republican Candidates for Texas Supreme Court
 Won by 51% or above     Place 3  D. Lehrmann,        Place 5   Paul Green,               Place 9  Eva Guzman
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Republican Candidate 

 Place 2:   Ray Wayless   Mary Lou Keel

 Place 5    Brent Webster  Scott Walker  
Upcoming State Election Dates and the GOP Delegate Count
May 17 Oregon  
May 24 Washington  
June 7 California  
June 7 Montana  
June 7 New Jersey  
June 7 New Mexico  
June 7 South Dakota  


American Samoa 
District of Columbia 



New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York

North Carolina
North Dakota
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota

Virgin Island
West Virginia






​Alphabetical Listing of States / Territories
Winning Republican and Democratic Candidate
Current Delegate Counts - May 17
Need to Win:
             1237                          2383

​                    1143                                  1758

Trump                      Clinton

              563                             1075

Cruz                        Sanders







Bush 4       Fiorina 1    Huchabee 1

Rand Paul 1

Lone Star Rail in existential crisis after Union Pacific breakup 
  Read more here
Date:  May 24, 2016      Time: 10:18 pm 
Primary Run-Off Elections

Walker County Winners Are: 
County Commissioner 1 :  Danny Kuykendall
County Commissioner 3 :  Bill Daughette
Constable, Precinct 2 :        Shane Loosier

Walker County Results Only
Railroad Commissioner: 
Wayne Christian  60.25%     Gary Gates  39.74%

Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals, Position 2
Ray Wheless  45.99%    Mary Lou Keel 54.50%

Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals, Position 5
Scott Walker  61.05%    Brent Webster 38.94%
Paul Davidhizer Wins City Council At Large Position 
Texas House of Representatives. District 18 
Winner:    Ernest Bailes    67.42%     
                                               Keith Strahan  32.57%  

And the Winners Are:
 County Commissioner, Precinct 1
  Danny Kuykendall     59.16%
County Commissioner, Precinct 3
Bill Daughette   55.76%
Constable, Precinct 2
Shane Loosier   54.44 %
Texas House of Representatives,
 District 18

Earnest Bailes with  67.42%

Liberty  57.15%   San Jacinto  87.06%
Walker  66.59%
Liberty County                            57.15%               42.84%

San Jacinto County                    87.06%                12.93%

Walker County                           66.59%                  33.40%
May 24, 2016    Final Results are not in at 9:53 pm